Transcranial ultrasonography in the detection of cerebrovascular accident: a systematic review and bivariate random-effects meta-analysis
Journal
Frontiers in Neurology
ISSN
1664-2295
Date Issued
2026-02-19
Author(s)
Ricardo Pinto-Villalba
Andrea Paz
Jordy Arellano
Galo García
Mateo Carrera
Sergio Cardona
Jose A. Rodas
Jose E. Leon-Rojas
Abstract
Background/objectives:
Stroke remains a leading cause of disability and death worldwide, with rapid diagnosis critical for effective treatment. Transcranial ultrasonography offers a potentially valuable diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited settings.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) for detecting ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and bivariate random-effects meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023471425). Three databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 20, 2022. We included studies assessing adult (≥18 years) stroke patients using TCD or TCCS compared to reference standards (MRI, CT, or angiography).
Exclusion criteria included pediatric populations, animal studies, vasospasm assessments, and studies with <10 participants. Four reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using NIH tools. Primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity and specificity analyzed using bivariate random-effects models; this technique was chosen as it jointly analyses sensitivity and specificity using a random-effects model that accounts for their correlation and between-study variability.
Results:
From 16,397 records, 26 studies met inclusion criteria, with 13 studies (n = 802 ultrasound examinations) included in meta-analysis. Overall diagnostic accuracy showed sensitivity of 81.1% (95% CI 73.1–87.2%) and specificity of 85.5% (95% CI 71.4–93.3%), with an AUC of 0.874. TCCS demonstrated higher sensitivity for hemorrhagic stroke (87.8%) than for ischemic stroke (77.2%). TCCS showed sensitivity of 74.8% (95% CI 66.4–81.6%) and specificity of 85.2% (95% CI 63.0–95.1%), with an AUC of 0.796. Risk of bias was low in 30.6% of studies, moderate in 50%, and high in 19.4%. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2 = 6.2–23.1%).
Conclusion:
Transcranial ultrasonography demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for stroke detection. While operator-dependent and limited by acoustic window availability, these techniques, after thorough training and validation, may be prioritized in low-resource setting were computed tomography is not readily available through the means of formal capacitation and feasibility studies. The moderate risk of bias in half of included studies suggests a lack of higher-quality research.
Systematic review registration: CRD42023471425.
Stroke remains a leading cause of disability and death worldwide, with rapid diagnosis critical for effective treatment. Transcranial ultrasonography offers a potentially valuable diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited settings.
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transcranial Doppler (TCD) and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCS) for detecting ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and bivariate random-effects meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023471425). Three databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 20, 2022. We included studies assessing adult (≥18 years) stroke patients using TCD or TCCS compared to reference standards (MRI, CT, or angiography).
Exclusion criteria included pediatric populations, animal studies, vasospasm assessments, and studies with <10 participants. Four reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using NIH tools. Primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity and specificity analyzed using bivariate random-effects models; this technique was chosen as it jointly analyses sensitivity and specificity using a random-effects model that accounts for their correlation and between-study variability.
Results:
From 16,397 records, 26 studies met inclusion criteria, with 13 studies (n = 802 ultrasound examinations) included in meta-analysis. Overall diagnostic accuracy showed sensitivity of 81.1% (95% CI 73.1–87.2%) and specificity of 85.5% (95% CI 71.4–93.3%), with an AUC of 0.874. TCCS demonstrated higher sensitivity for hemorrhagic stroke (87.8%) than for ischemic stroke (77.2%). TCCS showed sensitivity of 74.8% (95% CI 66.4–81.6%) and specificity of 85.2% (95% CI 63.0–95.1%), with an AUC of 0.796. Risk of bias was low in 30.6% of studies, moderate in 50%, and high in 19.4%. Heterogeneity was low to moderate (I2 = 6.2–23.1%).
Conclusion:
Transcranial ultrasonography demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for stroke detection. While operator-dependent and limited by acoustic window availability, these techniques, after thorough training and validation, may be prioritized in low-resource setting were computed tomography is not readily available through the means of formal capacitation and feasibility studies. The moderate risk of bias in half of included studies suggests a lack of higher-quality research.
Systematic review registration: CRD42023471425.